As the crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant recedes from mainstream media coverage the situation is presumed to be stabilising, largely because TEPCO and the Japanese government have confined themselves to positive news regarding cooling operations and the restoration of mains electricity power to the site.
Recently we have had reports of some food and water contamination in Fukushima Prefecture and reassurances that the situation is not worsening at the four crippled reactors and that radiation levels are remaining low. The story, as far as the media is concerned, has largely become one of human interest regarding the clearly heroic efforts of staff and volunteers at the site. But serious questions remain unanswered and largely unmentioned, specifically regarding the most threatening risks at the plant:
Edward Morse, a professor of nuclear engineering at the University of California, Berkeley, added that it will take huge amounts of water to compensate for the cracks in the containment pools that were uncovered by U.S. surveillance aircraft on Friday.
“The best thing to do is use as much of the Pacific Ocean as possible,” he said.
Ralph Vartabedian, W J Hennigan and Thomas H Maugh II What are the options for containing Fukushima’s radioactive emissions? LAT via Bellingham Herald 18 Mar 11
Say what? “Cracks in the containment pools that were uncovered by U.S. surveillance aircraft on Friday?”
The same article refers to an estimate by the “alarmist” French Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire (IRSN), the equivalent of our Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), regarding the degree of contamination released so far:
The French nuclear agency IRSN said Friday that Fukushima had already released 10 percent as much radioactivity as Chernobyl, but the agency has been criticized for being alarmist.Ralph Vartabedian, W J Hennigan and Thomas H Maugh II What are the options for containing Fukushima’s radioactive emissions? LAT via Bellingham Herald 18 Mar 11
TEPCO has now apparently connected power to reactors Nos 5 and 6, which is a blessing, where spent fuel pools had been gradually heating up over recent days, and these are now reported to have coolant circulating. But these are the least damaged of the reactors on the site, are some distance from the others and, like unit No 4, were in cold shutdown at the time of the earthquake.
As for reactors Nos 1-4, the cooling and power work is ongoing and there is some concern that one or all of them may have sustained damage to ancillary equipment, Nos 1-3 the reactor cores and, in the case of No 2, the containment. As long ago as last Wednesday the chief of the NRC, Gregory Jaczko, in Congressional testimony, flatly stated that the spent fuel pool of reactor No 4, where 1,097 tonnes of spent fuel is 1,479 spent fuel rods are stored, had boiled dry.
Without going into an analysis of the radiation levels made public from near the plant and elsewhere, readings largely taken upwind of the prevailing weather patterns, it is plausible that there remains considerable cause for concern regarding the status of the plant and the risk to the Japanese population. The Japanese health agency has revised the acceptable dosage of radiation for adults from 100 mSv to 250 mSv in recent days, according to NHK.
It is disturbing to note, also, that there has been information available to the Japanese authorities and the public which has not been released. Information on which some of the concerns regarding Fukushima No 4’s spent fuel pool are possibly based:
The Manichai Daily news reports that the Japanese government has in its possession video footage of the Fukushima No. 1 Nuclear Power Plant taken by a U.S. military reconnaissance drone, but has yet to release the footage to the public, sources have revealed.The footage taken from an RQ-4 Global Hawk drone was passed on to the Japanese government with permission for public release from the U.S. Air Force. U.S. military sources said that the decision to release the footage – or not – was up to the Japanese government.
Gary Mortimer – Japan reluctant to disclose footage of power plant taken by U.S. drone sUAS News 19 Mar 11
It is worth noting this aircraft has sophisticated thermal imaging technology which would be able to provide analysis of the temperature signature of the spent fuel pools and on the basis of which it is plausible to assume the NRC analysis was made. We don’t know. But the drone has been in use since 12 March 2011, before the comments were made.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) earlier expressed similar concerns:
“Unit-4 remains a major safety concern,” the Vienna-based agency said late yesterday in a statement. There was no information available on the level of water in the spent fuel pond, the agency said.Japan’s Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said yesterday there is a possibility there’s no water at the cooling pool. If exposed to air, the fuel rods could decay, catch fire and spew radioactive materials into the air.
Jonathan Tirone – Japan Unit-4 Pool’s Heat Exceeded Three-Times Normal, IAEA Says Bloomberg 18 Mar 11
Since then TEPCO has made a valiant effort to replenish the water in the spent fuel pools of reactors Nos 3 and 4 and it is earnestly hoped this effort is successful but if the pools are damaged this will be on ongoing and extremely hazardous undertaking. Even TEPCO could not rule out late last week that there was an outside chance of “criticality” of the fuel stored in No 4 in a worst-case scenario. Regular updates of the status of the reactors is both alarming and unspecific regarding the most critical problem areas.
It is a concern that we are not getting reliable information on the status of these units or the equally crippled reactor No 2. Even a human interest story on the heroic staff contains suggestions of a general clampdown on information around the plant:
A family friend of one of the workers – the team battling to control the crisis at the power plant – said that email and phone access had been cut and one man had been unable to speak to his wife for days.The move comes after one of the Fifty texted his wife in Japan saying that drinking water at the plant was running low, adding: “I feel like I’m coming down with something.”
Andrew Gilligan, Robert Mendick and Nikki Kininmonth – Japan nuclear crisis: ‘Fukushima Fifty’ cut off from family Telegraph 19 Mar 11
While acknowledging that there has been some excessively dramatic reporting on the part of the mainstream media over the past week it is equally disconcerting to have a virtual media blackout of specific, critical aspects of an event with such grave implications for all concerned. An excellent and balanced analysis of the media management of this event can be found here. Either TEPCO has neglected to mention important milestones in bringing the situation to a positive outcome, isn’t telling us everything or simply doesn’t know.
[Update] Replaced photo at top of diary with more recent image of Fukushima No 3, 21 Mar 11 (AP Photo/Tokyo Electric Power Co.) 21 Mar 11
122 comments