I watched both of the speeches last night and the most stark difference was how Obama stated his case in a way that left Boehner room to maneuver, while Boehner came with personal broadsides directed squarely at the President. He laid out two options, either accept our narrative and cave to all our demands or we will force your veto-ing hand to flush the full faith and credit of the US (God I’m sick of hearing that phrase) down the proverbial toilet.
And the so-called liberal media is failing to call this what it is in consistent fashion: a concerted attempt to bring down a sitting president no matter who and what is damaged in the process.
I’m curious why Boehner was even given time to rebut the president. This wasn’t the state of the union. If anything, if Boehner wanted to speak, he should have gone first. Doesn’t the presidency count for anything anymore? In the mean time, George Will has a disgusting piece out in the aftermath entitled “Congress Reminds Obama He’s President, Not King.” Really? This about a man who hasn’t mentioned the words “veto” or “fourteenth amendment,” both presidential prerogatives, in the whole freaking process?
One thing is for sure, if they do manage to beat Obama, they shouldn’t expect ANY deference to the incoming GOPresident, as they have spent the past 3 years defecating on the current office holder. Their stink will remain all over it. It’s simply getting to the point that 365 days a year of hardball politics isn’t the problem. We’ve already got that and the perpetrators aren’t going to let up for a minute. In this situation, only hardball politics can provide a solution. There might be limits to what an aikido pres. can do in the face of non-stop automatic fire.
I say fourteenth amendment now.
245 comments