Motley Moose – Archive

Since 2008 – Progress Through Politics

President Obama: “This isn’t theater”

It is emblematic of the hyperpartisanship which has our country in a stranglehold that the president has to remind people that the humanitarian crisis on the border is not theater. But apparently, no crisis or incident (BENGHAZIII!), can be addressed without first dousing the follicles set ablaze by the media and their need to fill air time and print to satisfy the 10-minute news cycle.

From NBC News

President Barack Obama on Wednesday said he is not visiting the U.S. border while in Texas because he is “not interested in photo-ops” and urged Congress to approve funding to deal with the surge of minors illegally streaming into the country.

“There is nothing that is taking place down there that I am not intimately aware of and briefed on,” Obama said. “This isn’t theater, this is a problem. I’m not interested in photo ops.

Obama met with local politicians and religious leaders in Dallas, including Texas Gov. Rick Perry, to discuss the influx of unaccompanied minors crossing the U.S. border. The White House has asked for $3.7 billion to deal with the crisis, a request that has been panned by some Republicans who say the president’s policies are to blame for migrant children believing they can stay in the country illegally.

Pardon me, the president’s policies??? The Senate passed a bipartisan immigration reform bill that reflected the president’s policies and which would have helped mitigate this crisis, including some of the money that is now part of an emergency request. But the Republican House of Representatives would not take up the bill because they knew it would pass and that would enrage the nativist wing of the increasingly wingnutty Republican Party. And it is more important to keep their base frothing for the mid-term elections than to solve problems.

In a statement, Gov. Rick Perry (R-TX) blames “bad public policy” … policies being talked about since 2000, advanced by Senator John McCain (R-AZ) and then disowned by Presidential Candidate John McCain in 2008, giving permission for the rest of the Republican Party to run away from it.

Presidential Candidate Rick Perry sent a press release, er, letter to the president in 2012 complaining about the border crisis and said he never received an answer. The White House said “federal officials briefed the governor’s staff more than once on the administration’s efforts to deal with border security after receiving it.” By working quietly to address the issues, not in dueling press releases.

Apparently, Gov. Perry suggested Wednesday that the president act on his own to solve the crisis. Pardon me again … HAHAHAHA™  bubbanomics!! Here is what the president replied:

“[Gov. Perry] suggested maybe you just need to go ahead and act and that might convince Republicans that they should go ahead and pass the supplemental. And I had to remind him I am getting sued right now by Mr. Boehner, apparently, for going ahead and acting instead of going through Congress.”

THAT is what passes for problem solving in the Do-Nothing 113th Congress.

Critics of the president complained because he drank beer and shot pool in Denver on Wednesday when he should have been visiting the border. He needs to DO SOMETHING!!! Or maybe not:

Rep. Pete Gallego (D-Tex.), whose district stretches from San Antonio to El Paso and includes the longest stretch of the Mexican border of any House district, defended the White House on Wednesday.

A presidential visit “would create an unneeded distraction by diverting law enforcement and other resources at a critical time,” Gallego said in a statement. “We don’t need photo ops, we need action. The ball is in Congress’s court to do this right.”

And about the party of George W. “I Hire Arabian Horse Guys To Manage Disaster Relief” Bush and Senator John “I Had An Immigration Bill But Was Skeered By The Nativists” McCain complaining about misplaced priorities and socializing when there was a crisis?

“August 29, Hurricane Katrina makes landfall after forming over a 5 day period: 1,833 fatalities, $108 billion in damage”

Except in that case, there was something that a more engaged president could have done  because that crisis did not involve foreign governments and dealing with a recalcitrant Congress; it simply required leadership and caring enough about human beings who were in a desperate situation to put competent people in charge.

~

Excerpts from the Statement by the President on Immigration (full transcript at link).

6:00 P.M. CDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, everybody.  I just had a good meeting with Governor Perry, local officials, and faith leaders to talk about the steps that we have taken and that we need to take to address the humanitarian situation on the border.  And I want to thank everybody who’s been involved for taking the time to talk to me.

It’s important to recognize two things.  First, the surge of unaccompanied children, and adults with children, are arriving at one sector of the border, and that’s the Rio Grande Valley.  Second, the issue is not that people are evading our enforcement officials.  The issue is that we’re apprehending them in large numbers.  And we’re working to make sure that we have sufficient facilities to detain, house, and process them appropriately, while attending to unaccompanied children with the care and compassion that they deserve while they’re in our custody.

While we intend to do the right thing by these children, their parents need to know that this is an incredibly dangerous situation and it is unlikely that their children will be able to stay.  And I’ve asked parents across Central America not to put their children in harm’s way in this fashion.

Right now, there are more Border Patrol agents and surveillance resources on the ground than at any time in our history.  And we deport almost 400,000 migrants each year.  But as soon as it became clear that this year’s migration to the border was different than in past years, I directed FEMA to coordinate our response at the border.  Members of my Cabinet and my staff have made multiple trips to facilities there.  And we’re also addressing the root of the problem.  I sent Vice President Biden and Secretary Kerry and Secretary Johnson to meet with Central American leaders, as well as working with our international partners to go after smugglers who are putting their kids’ lives at risk.

And earlier this week, Mexico announced a series of steps that they’re going to take on their southern border to help stem the tide of these unaccompanied children.

Last week, I sent a letter to Congress asking them to increase penalties on smugglers and to give us flexibility to move migrants through the system faster.

Yesterday, I asked Congress to fund these efforts.  About half of the resources would go to border security, enforcement, and expedited removal of people who don’t qualify for a humanitarian claim.  About half would go to make sure we’re treating children humanely.  We’d also make investments to further tackle the root problems in Central America.

So right now, Congress has the capacity to work with us, work with state officials, local officials, and faith-based groups and non-for-profits who are helping to care for these kids — Congress has the capacity to work with all parties concerned to directly address the situation.  They’ve said they want to see a solution.  The supplemental offers them the capacity to vote immediately to get it done.

Of course, in the long run, the best way to truly address this problem is for the House of Representatives to pass legislation fixing our broken immigration system, which, by the way, would include funding for additional thousands of Border Patrol agents — something that everybody down here that I’ve talked to indicates is a priority.

The Senate passed a common-sense, bipartisan bill more than a year ago.  It would have strengthened the border, added an additional 20,000 Border Patrol agents.  It would have strengthened our backlogged immigration courts.  It would have put us in a stronger position to deal with this surge and, in fact, prevent it. […]

So the bottom line is, actually, that there’s nothing that the Governor indicated he’d like to see that I have a philosophical objection to.  I’ve asked Jeh Johnson to contact his head of Health and Human Services when he comes down for the sixth time at the end of this week to coordinate and make sure that some of the suggestions that the Governor has are technically feasible and what kind of resources might be needed. But what I emphasized to the Governor was the problem here is not a major disagreement around the actions that could be helpful in dealing with the problem.  The challenge is, is Congress prepared to act to put the resources in place to get this done.

Another way of putting it — and I said this directly to the Governor — is are folks more interested in politics, or are they more interested in solving the problem?  If they’re interested in solving the problem, then this can be solved.  If the preference is for politics, then it won’t be solved.

[…]

The final point I’ll make is I just want to thank some of the faith-based groups that I just met with, as well as mayors, commissioners, local officials.  Dallas has been incredibly compassionate in looking at some sights, some facilities in which they can accommodate some of these children.  And I indicated in hearing the stories of churches that are prepared to not just make donations but send volunteers to help construct some of these facilities or fix them up, and their willingness to volunteer in providing care and assistance to these children — I told them thank you, because it confirmed what I think we all know, which is the American people are an incredibly compassionate people and when we see a child in need we want to care for them.

But what I think we all agreed on is, is that the best thing that we can do is to make sure that the children are able to live in their own countries safely.  And that’s why it’s going to be important, even as we solve the short-term problem here, for us to be able to direct attention and resources and assistance — as we’re doing, but not at a sustained and high enough level — back in Honduras and Guatemala and El Salvador and other places, so that parents don’t think that somehow it’s safer for their children to send them thousands of miles just so that they don’t get harmed.

Press questions followed.


24 comments

  1. For Kids In Immigration Court, Legal Counsel Is Catch As Catch Can

    The American Civil Liberties Union and other groups sued the federal government Wednesday for its failure to provide legal representation to immigrant children in deportation proceedings.

    The was filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of eight immigrants – ages 10 to 17 – who the ACLU says have not been able to find a lawyer. But the complaint applies to the tens of thousands of unaccompanied children who have illegally crossed the Southwest border in recent years and have ended up in U.S. immigration court.

    This is insane. Every American should be embarrassed:

    Judge Anibal D. Martinez sits at the bench in this small courtroom, presiding over the weekly juvenile immigration docket in San Antonio. At the table to his right sits a stern lawyer for the Department of Homeland Security, which seeks to remove children who cross the border illegally. And at the table on his left sits a pudgy, 9-year-old girl from Honduras named Berta Mejia Martinez.

    Berta wears a sparkly butterfly shirt, and she’s so small that her flip-flops don’t touch the blue carpet. At the moment, Berta is representing herself in immigration court, though an adult family friend who speaks English accompanies her.

    Martinez tells the girl in his booming judicial voice that he is postponing her hearing until late August to give her more time to get an attorney. She smiles bashfully.

    When he adjourns her case, Berta trots happily out of the courtroom …

  2. princesspat

    The Crisis of Children at the Border

    These are children we are talking about, not just numbers, not just data, not political pawns. And, although most may not meet the refugee threshold needed to stay in the United States, many may. How are we supposed to hold our heads high on humanitarian issues if, in our haste for a fix and our fixation on deterrence, we return even a few children to a place where their lives are in danger?

    As the White House has put it, this is “an urgent humanitarian situation.”

    I am ashamed, outraged and horrified re the refusal of Congress to act.  

  3. rb137

    Of course they think Obama is guilty of theater — it’s the only f-ing thing the GOP knows how to do anymore, so they can’t imagine anything else. It’s the All Fingers Point Away From Me Ragtime Blues (errrr…Reds.)

    Because of the GOP, theater is the only thing their based believes is possible.

    The saddest thing, though, is that the arguments put forth against immigration reform are not about immigration reform. They are about hate. They are about making people afraid and then telling them who to blame. These arguments have nothing to do with the families torn apart by their consequences. The brown people are just props.

  4. Maybe … but it will be a lose lose for him. The right-wing will cackle that they “made” him go, and then turn around and vilify him for turning it into the photo op that he did not want it to be.

    Ed Gilgore and Charlie Pierce

    Charlie Pierce is right: this is what presidents are already expected to do:


       The simple fact that the president is declining to go to the border while Glenn Beck is on the way down there with hot meals and soccer balls is a prima facie abdication of responsibility. It’s also goddamn embarrassing.

       It’s “risky”? Are these people kidding? Who in the hell is he listening to?

    ~snip~

    On occasion just showing up in a messy situation is more important than having a solution or being “right.” And it may be the only way for a president to pull rank and make the opposition look small.

    But should it be about making the opposition look small? I think it shouldn’t.

  5. Diana in NoVa

    for the “crime” of being president while black.

    Blast their hides! If thoughts were things, as some people claim, then they’d all be hit on the head with a simultaneous beam of light that would make them act rationally, for the good of the country they claim to “luh-uve.”

  6. Bundy-Style Militia Leader In Texas: ‘Get Back … Or You Will Be Shot’

    Operation Secure Our Border, with its own Facebook page, is being organized by members of the “Patriot” movement along with Oathkeepers and Three-Percenters, according to the San Antonio Express News. Those are some of the same militia groups that came to Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy’s defense earlier this year.

    The Express News and The Monitor in McAllen, Texas, both reported on a YouTube video featuring Chris Davis, who has been identified as the commander of the militia, in which he apparently explained how the border would be secured.

    “You see an illegal. You point your gun dead at him, right between his eyes, and you say, ‘Get back across the border or you will be shot,'” Davis said in the video, according to the reports.

    He later took the YouTube down claiming it was “taken out of context”. Yes, he meant to say “You see a brown person” not “You see an illegal”.

  7. “Those detainees have it so well!!”

    When you look at the lovely way they’re getting treated — they’re getting free health care, free housing, you know, they’re watching the World Cup on big screen TVs,” [Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-TX)] said on Sean Hannity’s radio show, as recorded by the Huffington Post.

    Er, no.

    However, photos of the detention centers show immigrants crammed together sitting on cement floors and benches, and locked up in holding cells. Photos provided to the Houston Chronicle by Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX) show some of the depressing conditions that undocumented immigrants are living in.

    After trips to a detention centers in Arizona and Texas, LA Times reporters Molly Hennesy-Fiske and Cindy Carcamo said the facilities were “crammed,” “unsanitary” and “reeked of sweat.”

  8. The So-Called Immigration Border Crisis Is Neither

    We have had an immigration crisis for a long time in the United States. Now we also have a humanitarian crisis. It’s important we understand the distinction-and do something to solve both. Some clarifying facts are in order.

    – Central American children are fleeing their countries because of violence.

    – Central American kids are NOT fleeing their countries because of US immigration policy.

    – The United States/Mexico border is NOT broken-this crisis actually shows the border is secure.

    – Republicans who attack Obama for not “enforcing laws” now don’t want to enforce Central American refugee laws we have on the books.

    – It’s time to solve our crises, not stand in the way.

    This:

    Republicans have been blocking legislation that would at least try to solve our nation’s immigration crisis. Now they’re blocking action that would address this humanitarian crisis as well. And that, frankly, is the only link between the two-that the Republican Party is consistently more interested in exploiting and attacking desperate human beings to score political points, rather than actually doing what these crises and our country demands.  It’s stunning that a party so responsible for creating military and economic havoc around the globe is so callous toward the human consequences of their policies and that conservatives who so regularly brag about “American exceptionalism” are so gravely hostile to people from around the world who want to come here.

  9. princesspat

    Trapped On The Border

    I write this from the city of McAllen, which sits in the Rio Grande Valley near the border, just across from the Mexican city of Reynosa. In the last 24 hours I realize that, for an undocumented immigrant like me, getting out of a border town in Texas-by plane or by land-won’t be easy. It might, in fact, be impossible.

    I flew into the valley Thursday morning to visit a shelter for unaccompanied Central American refugees and participate in a vigil in their honor. Outraged at the media coverage of this humanitarian crisis (these children are not “illegal,” as news organizations like CBS News and the New York Times call them), and frustrated by the political ping-pong centered on border security and increased enforcement, I also came here to share my own story of coming to the United States as an unaccompanied minor from the Philippines. I wanted to help change the narrative of the conversation and, with a camera crew, share stories from the shelter and its volunteers. The visit to the shelter was intense and sobering, watching small kids fight for their lives with nothing more than their spirits.

    Will his media access make a difference?

  10. Maybe they can convince their Sunday Morning Christians™ to care more.

    How A Broad Faith-Based Movement Is Coming Together To Aid Unaccompanied Children On The Border

    Various faith groups and churches from across the religious spectrum are already offering robust services for the unaccompanied children, with everything from baptist disaster relief services providing shelter for unaccompanied minors in Texas to individual Catholic churches in California harboring kids until they can find a suitable place to house them. However, many of these all-volunteer organizations report being overwhelmed by the recent flood of children crossing the border, spurring prominent faith leaders to call for more robust action by the government. On Thursday, a group of primarily progressive religious leaders delivered a petition to the Administration and Congress signed by more than 3,800 people of faith that called for providing immediate care for unaccompanied children. The letter, which was endorsed by influential clergy such as United Methodist Bishop Minerva Carcano and Rev. David Vasquez, spokesman for the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, also opposed efforts to “expeditiously deport these innocent children,” and insisted lawmakers increase funds for the Office of Refugee Resettlement, provide legal representation for children, and “provide access to visitation ministries, pastoral care, play and activities appropriate for children,” among other things.

    There is still quite a bit of ugly:

    Of course, not everyone in the faith community is willing to offer an unqualified hand to the beleaguered children. A particular brand of Tea Party evangelical, sometimes called “Teavangelicals,” have a reputation for passionately decrying pro-immigrant policies and even immigrants themselves. Some of these groups have staged protests to block buses of immigrant children attempting to cross the border. […] several baptist groups working with unaccompanied children have reported receiving angry phone calls from anonymous church members who argue that helping immigrants only encourages people to continue crossing the border.

Comments are closed.