Motley Moose – Archive

Since 2008 – Progress Through Politics

The 180 Names of the Wall of Shame

These 180 House members (179 Republicans and 1 Democrat) deserve to have their name emblazoned upon the wall of shame for opposing the expanded Sandy relief package that passed the House of Representatives this evening:

Aderholt

Amash

Amodei

Bachmann

Barr

Barton

Benishek

Bentivolio

Bilirakis

Bishop (UT)

Black

Blackburn

Brady (TX)

Bridenstine

Brooks (AL)

Brooks (IN)

Broun (GA)

Buchanan

Bucshon

Burgess

Calvert

Camp

Campbell

Carter

Cassidy

Chabot

Chaffetz

Coble

Coffman

Collins (GA)

Conaway

Cook

Cooper (D)

Cotton

Daines

DeSantis

DesJarlais

Duffy

Duncan (SC)

Duncan (TN)

Ellmers

Farenthold

Fincher

Fleischmann

Fleming

Flores

Forbes

Fortenberry

Foxx

Franks (AZ)

Gardner

Gibbs

Gingrey (GA)

Gohmert

Goodlatte

Gosar

Gowdy

Granger

Graves (GA)
Griffin (AR)

Griffith (VA)

Guthrie

Hall

Harris

Hartzler

Hastings (WA)

Heck (NV)

Hensarling

Holding

Hudson

Huelskamp

Huizenga (MI)

Hultgren

Hunter

Hurt

Issa

Jenkins

Johnson (OH)

Johnson, Sam

Jones

Jordan

Joyce

Kelly

King (IA)

Kinzinger (IL)

Kline

Labrador

LaMalfa

Lamborn

Lankford

Latham

Latta

Long

Luetkemeyer

Lummis

Marchant

Massie

McCaul

McClintock

McHenry

McMorris Rodgers

Meadows

Messer

Mica

Miller (FL)

Miller (MI)

Miller, Gary

Mullin

Mulvaney

Murphy (PA)

Neugebauer

Noem

Nugent

Nunnelee

Olson

Paulsen

Pearce

Perry

Petri
Pittenger

Pitts

Poe (TX)

Pompeo

Posey

Price (GA)

Radel

Renacci

Ribble

Rice (SC)

Rigell

Roby

Roe (TN)

Rogers (AL)

Rogers (MI)

Rohrabacher

Rokita

Rooney

Roskam

Ross

Rothfus

Royce

Ryan (WI)

Salmon

Scalise

Schock

Schweikert

Scott, Austin

Sensenbrenner

Sessions

Shuster

Simpson

Smith (NE)

Smith (TX)

Southerland

Stewart

Stivers

Stockman

Stutzman

Terry

Thompson (PA)

Thornberry

Tiberi

Tipton

Upton

Wagner

Walberg

Walden

Walorski

Weber (TX)

Webster (FL)

Wenstrup

Westmoreland

Williams

Wilson (SC)

Wittman

Womack

Woodall

Yoder

Yoho

Apparently these 180 believe that it’s okay to say “Screw you” to their fellow Americans who have suffered.  Apparently they believe that it’s more important to find offsets in the budget than help their fellow Americans in need.  Apparently they believe that it’s perfectly okay for federal aid to flow to Florida and Texas after hurricanes or Kansas and Alabama after tornadoes.  New York and New Jersey and Connecticut and many other places here in the Northeast are in need.  We need the largesse of the federal government to help us after we suffered.  It makes us no different than any other part of the country after a major natural disaster.

That 180 House members so easily turn their backs on us is an absolute disgrace.  While I haven’t checked, I’m sure that all of those that thought even $9 billion was too much also voted against this larger aid package.  Thankfully, however, the GOP leadership decided to abandon the Hastert Rule that required a majority of the majority.  It still took way too long because of Boehner’s machinations, but at least it finally got done, even if it was months too late.

It’s important to remember the biggest difference between us and them.  When their districts suffered, we didn’t look for offsets in the budget.  We didn’t quibble over how large a package was going to be passed.  We simply asked, “How much do you need?”  Once we got the figure, we proceeded to support it.  And the next time their districts are in need, even though they did their best to kick us in the gut, we’ll still simply ask “How much do you need?” because our fellow Americans are suffering and that is enough for us.


37 comments

  1. kirbybruno

    Did any of them give any reasons why? Not that I can think of one that would have made sense, but I am just curious how they justify their vote.

  2. jlms qkw

    good for him, finally.

    one freaking dem, what a jerk.

    i see the rest of the ut delegation voted no, stewart (mine now), chaffetz, & bishop.  

    dear ghods, please let utah never have a catastrophe requiring federal help.  lest there by payback.

    matheson is going to hear about that vote in his next election.  undoubtedly.  

  3. Nurse Kelley

    Y’all remember the Waldo Canyon Fire last summer? That was in Dougie’s district. (He probably voted against any help for that, too.)

  4. melvin

    this is the public suicide of the teapublican party. The asshole Gohmert (R-Loony Tunes) is still up there blathering away.

  5. HappyinVT

    DKElections 8:42pm via bitly

    Jim Cooper, 2010: “There is a lot of hardship in Nashville. We got to make sure everybody gets every penny of help.” dkel.ec/XCb9oa

    Retweeted by KailiJoy

  6. nomandates

    In addition to the ones labeled, I recognize Steve Stockman and Pete Olson at a glance. I was stuck with Olson before the most recent gerrymandering, and now I’m stuck with Stockman, who was elected to a new safe district created especially for the GOP.

    Just so y’all know, the area that Stockman and Randy Weber supposedly represent was hit hard by Hurricane Ike in Sept 2008, with many schools and businesses being shut down for at least 2 weeks afterward.

    I don’t have the energy tonight, but I’m planning to identify all of the ones from Texas.

    Texas needs its own wall of shame for this one, but the local media probably won’t even cover this vote.

  7. blue jersey mom

    Here in NJ we pay more in federal taxes and get less back than any other state in the nation. Now when we need the help, all these idiots refuse to help us.  

  8. sricki

    Politicians vote the way they do in Congress to get votes and contributions so they can keep their jobs, right? Okay, so who are these voters they are anticipating WON’T vote for them if they support a relief package? Are Republican voters really that callous.

    Uh, forget I asked that. Common sense just answered my question.

    Sadly, my father is probably one of those Republicans who would be pissed at a GOP Rep who voted to help New Jersey.

    **shakes head**

  9. George W. Bush’s war of choice in Iraq and ballooning the deficit?

    One of the funniest things I heard a Republican congressman say in the debate yesterday was that the country just can’t keep spending money it does not have with no accountability.

    HAHAHAHAHAHA!!

    We are still wondering about the $9 billion that went missing in Iraq.  

Comments are closed.