Motley Moose – Archive

Since 2008 – Progress Through Politics

Saturday All Day Check-in for the Herd

  Make sure you let your peeps

  know where to find you!  


    PLEASE Do Not Recommend the check-in diary!
   

        Fierces on the Weather Critter Comment are obligatory welcome.

The morning check-in is an open thread posted to give you a place to visit with the meeses. Feel free to chat about your weather, share a bit of your life, grump (if you must), rave (if you can). The diarist du jour sometimes posts and runs, other times sticks around for a bit, often returns throughout the day and always cares that meeses are happy … or at least contented.

On weekends (and holidays), you may find the check-in thread earlier or later than normal because … it is the weekend! Moosies need their beauty rest:

For those new to the Moose, Kysen left a Moose Welcome Mat (Part Deux) so, please, wipe your feet before you walk in the front door start posting.

The important stuff to get you started:

– Comments do not Auto-refresh. Click the refresh/reload on your tab to see new ones. Only click Post once for comments. When a diary’s comment threads grow, the page takes longer to refresh and the comment may not display right away.

– To check for replies to your comments, click the “My Comments” link in the right-hand column (or go to “My Moose”). Comments will be listed and a link to Recent Replies will be shown. (Note: Tending comments builds community)

– Ratings: Fierce means Thumbs Up, Fail means Thumbs Down, Meh means one of three things: I am unFailing you but I can’t Fierce you, I am unFiercing after a mistaken Fierce, or Meh. Just Meh. (p.s. Ratings don’t bestow mojo, online behaviour does).

– The Recommended list has a prominent place on the Front Page because it reflects the interests of the Moose. When people drive-by, we want them to see what we are talking about: news, politics, science, history, personal stories, culture. The list is based on number of recs and days on the list. Per Kysen: “The best way to control Rec List content is to ONLY rec diaries you WANT to see ON the list.

– Finally, the posting rules for a new diary: “Be excellent to each other… or else

(Some other commenting/posting/tending notes for newbies can be found in this past check-in and, of course, consult Meese Mehta for all your questions on meesely decorum.)

You can follow the daily moosetrails here: Motley Moose Recent Comments.

~

So, what’s going on in your part of Moosesylvania??

~


Friday Coffee Hour: Check In and Hangout for the Herd

Good morning, Moosekind. TGIF!


  PLEASE Do Not Recommend the check-in diary!
 

        Recs on the weather jar comment are still welcome.

 photo Fridaymorningcoffeehour_zpsba607506.jpg

Friday Coffee Hour and check-in is an open thread and general social hour.

It’s traditional but not obligatory to give us a weather check where you are and let us know what’s new, interesting, challenging or even routine in your life lately. Nothing is particularly obligatory here except:

Always remember the Moose Golden (Purple?) Rule:

Be kind to each other… or else.

What could be simpler than that, right?

 photo aasometimes_zps8f13f480.jpg


In the News: Senate getting Boggsed down?

Found on the Internets …



A series of tubes filled with enormous amounts of material, some of it contradictory.

~

Harry Reid In A Jam Over Controversial Obama Nominee Michael Boggs

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said Wednesday he cannot vote for Michael Boggs, a controversial Obama nominee to be a federal judge who has faced fierce criticism from progressives.

“Unless I have a better explanation. I can’t vote for him. This is a lifetime appointment. He’s said some things and made some decisions I think are not very good,” Reid told BuzzFeed. “Boggs is not somebody I’m going to vote for unless I have some explanations on why he did that deal with the rebel flag and things he’s said about abortion.”

As a Georgia state legislator from 2000 to 2004, Boggs voted to keep the state’s old flag which included the Confederate battle flag. He voted for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage and for various anti-abortion bills, one of which pro-choice activists say endangers doctors.

~

Senators Grill Obama Nominee On Gay Marriage, Abortion, Confederate Flag

The Georgia Court of Appeals judge has come under fierce criticism from progressive advocates for a swath of votes from 2000 to 2004 as a Georgia state legislator against abortion rights, same-sex marriage and to retain the state’s old flag which contained the Confederate battle flag.

Democratic senators took the lead in grilling Boggs.

“I was offended by the flag, Senator,” he told Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) under questioning, saying it was a “terribly agonizing” decision to choose between his own conscience and the will of his constituents, whom he suggested wanted to keep the Confederate-linked flag. But he said: “I’m glad the flag was changed.”

Boggs said he was very sensitive to the views of African-Americans at the time and that those who know him recognize his vote intended no disrespect to them. “If someone is accusing someone of being a racist, I don’t know how you disprove that,” he said. […]

“I don’t think my legislative record that’s over a decade old is indicative of what kind of judge I’d be [on the federal court],” Boggs said.

Did you lack integrity then, sir, or do you lack integrity now?

Regarding the “deal” that makes Boggs part of a package to get past the archaic “blue slip” rule:

“I have noted before that there is no ‘deal’ negotiated with me as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee or with any of the other Senators,” Leahy said in written testimony. “The constitutional responsibility of advice and consent resides with each individual Senator, and there is no such thing as a binding deal that negates each Senator’s responsibility to determine the fitness of a judicial nominee for a lifetime appointment.”

~

Meet The Republican Judge Fighting To Bail Scott Walker Out Of A Criminal Investigation

Last Tuesday, a Republican federal judge named Rudolph Randa handed down an unusual order cutting off a criminal investigation alleging illegal coordination between several political campaigns – including Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s (R) 2012 recall campaign – and conservative groups such as the Wisconsin Club for Growth. Randa speckled his order with uncharacteristic rhetoric for a judge tasked with being a neutral and impartial arbiter of the law. At one point, he labels the criminal probe “a long-running investigation of all things Walker-related.” At another point, he compares efforts to reign in excessive campaign spending to “the Guillotine and the Gulag.”[…]

Beyond whatever ideological lens Randa brings to his courtroom, as George Zornick points out, he also has an unusually personal connection to the criminal probe that he shut down. Randa’s judicial assistant is married to a top lawyer for the Walker campaign.

Oh … and Randa’s wife is a huge contributor to Scott Walker’s campaigns.

Lifetime appointment? And lifetime permission to game the system for partisan politics.

~

More …

More News …

Reid Pushes Constitutional Amendment To Limit Money In Politics

Harry Reid endorsed a constitutional amendment Thursday to overturn the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling and permit restrictions on money in politics, billed in part as an effort to limit the Koch brothers’ influence on elections.

The Democratic Senate majority leader promised hearings and votes on the measure, sponsored by Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO), which would restore Congress’ authority to restrict campaign spending.

“The Supreme Court has equated money with speech, so the more money you have the more speech you get, and the more influence in our democracy. That is wrong,” the Nevada Democrat said in a floor speech. “Every American should have the same ability to influence our political system. One American, one vote. That’s what the Constitution guarantees. … No one should be able to pump unlimited funds into political campaigns, whether they are a Democrat, a Republican, or an Independent.”

Now there’s something to run on.

~

North Carolina Voters Want To End Partisan Gerrymandering

By a wide margin, North Carolina voters say they want to replace their state’s current system of political gerrymandering with a non-partisan redistricting option, according to a new poll. This survey comes days after former Raleigh Mayor Charles Meeker (D) and former Charlotte Mayor and gubernatorial nominee Richard Vinroot (R) announced a bipartisan push for a fair redistricting process in their state.

The poll by the North Carolina-based Public Policy Polling found that among those familiar with the idea, 45 percent of registered North Carolina voters support nonpartisan redistricting, while just 18 percent oppose it. The concept enjoys support among Democrats (48 percent to 14), Republicans (37 to 25), and independents (49 to 17).

~

Hagel: U.S. Drones Searching For Kidnapped Nigerian Schoolgirls

Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel said Wednesday that the U.S. is using surveillance drones to try to locate more than 270 kidnapped schoolgirls in Nigeria.

“We are now providing unmanned reconnaissance intelligence over Nigeria and we’ll continue to do that,” Hagel told reporters in Saudi Arabia at a meeting of the Gulf Cooperation Council.

~

Editor’s Note: Feel free to share other news stories in the comments.


Thursday Morning Herd Check-in

  Make sure you let your peeps

  know where to find you!  

   


    PLEASE Do Not Recommend the check-in diary


        Fierces on the Weather Critter Comment are obligatory welcome.

The morning check-in is an open thread posted to give you a place to visit with the meeses. Feel free to chat about your weather, share a bit of your life, grump (if you must), rave (if you can). The diarist du jour sometimes posts and runs, other times sticks around for a bit, often returns throughout the day and always cares that meeses are happy … or at least contented.

For those new to the Moose, Kysen left a Moose Welcome Mat (Part Deux) so, please, wipe your feet before you walk in the front door start posting.

The important stuff to get you started:

– Comments do not Auto-refresh. Click the refresh/reload on your tab to see new ones. Only click Post once for comments. When a diary’s comment threads grow, the page takes longer to refresh and the comment may not display right away.

– To check for replies to your comments, click the “My Comments” link in the right-hand column (or go to “My Moose”). Comments will be listed and a link to Recent Replies will be shown. (Note: Tending comments builds community)

– Ratings: Fierce means Thumbs Up, Fail means Thumbs Down, Meh means one of three things: I am unFailing you but I can’t Fierce you, I am unFiercing after a mistaken Fierce, … or Meh. Just Meh. (p.s. Ratings don’t bestow mojo, online behaviour does).

– The Recommended list has a prominent place on the Front Page because it reflects the interests of the Moose. When people drive-by, we want them to see what we are talking about: news, politics, science, history, personal stories, culture. The list is based on number of recs and days on the list. Per Kysen: “The best way to control Rec List content is to ONLY rec diaries you WANT to see ON the list.

– Finally, the posting rules for a new diary: “Be excellent to each other… or else

(Some other commenting/posting/tending notes for newbies can be found in this past check-in and, of course, consult Meese Mehta for all your questions on meesely decorum.)

You can follow the daily moosetrails here: Motley Moose Recent Comments.

~

So, what’s going on in your part of Moosesylvania?

~


Penny “wise” and pound foolish: Investing in infrastructure cannot be deferred

From the White House:

White House Blog: A Numbers-Based Case for Why It’s Time to Act on Infrastructure

The United States was once known as a leader in infrastructure, and we’re slipping:

When the American Society of Civil Engineers graded our infrastructure systems last fall, they gave our road and transit systems a D, our bridges a C+, and our levees a D-.

But here’s the real problem: The funding we have in place to fix them is set to run out by fall. That puts at risk more than 112,000 active projects that are currently paving our roads and building our bridges, as well as approximately 5,600 projects that are actively improving our transit systems – not to mention the nearly 700,000 jobs that these collective projects support.

It’s time to get this done. That’s why this week, the President is calling on Congress to pass a bill to put Americans to work repairing our crumbling roads and bridges – avoiding a crisis in the short term, and helping to position our economy for long-term growth.

And today, we’re releasing a new analysis that makes a numbers-based case for exactly why we need to invest in infrastructure right now – and what it’s going to mean for all of us if Congress fails to act.

Take a look at the new analysis that the White House released today – we guarantee you’ll learn something you didn’t know. And when you do, you should pass it on.

More …

The Economic Importance of Investing in our Infrastructure (PDF)

President Obama and his administration are focused every day on what we can do to expand opportunity for every American. In today’s economy, that includes building first-class infrastructure that attracts first-class jobs and carries goods from American businesses all across the world. That’s why President Obama has laid out a vision for a 21st century transportation infrastructure that would support current investment plans in all 50 states and build the foundation for lasting economic growth – while avoiding Highway Trust Fund insolvency. That proposal is fully paid for through one-time revenue from business tax reforms that will spur investment and create jobs by closing loopholes that reward companies for moving jobs overseas.

The Grow America Act addresses this:

The GROW AMERICA Act, or Generating Renewal, Opportunity, and Work with Accelerated Mobility, Efficiency, and Rebuilding of Infrastructure and Communities throughout America, will do exactly what its name implies:

   It will support millions of American jobs repairing and modernizing our roads, bridges, railways, and transit systems;

   It will help ensure that American businesses can compete effectively in the global economy and grow; and

   It will pave the way forward by increasing access to the ladders of opportunity that help Americans get ahead.

We visited eight states and 13 cities as part of our Invest in America, Commit to the Future bus tour this month and everywhere we went, we heard the same thing -people want more transportation options and better roads and bridges to get them where they need to go. Failing to act before the Highway Trust Fund runs out is unacceptable and unaffordable.

The GROW AMERICA Act offers the kind of job creation and certainty that the American people want and deserve. It represents a number of proposals that have historically attracted bipartisan support.

More information is available from the GROW AMERICA Act fact sheets.

 

This is the Moose Mid-Week Open News Thread. Feel free to share other news stories in the comments.


Wednesday Watering Hole: Check In & Hangout for the Herd

Good morning, Moosekind.  


  PLEASE Do Not Recommend the check-in diary!
 

        Recs on the weather jar comment are still welcome.

The common Moose, Alces alces, unlike other members of the deer family, is a solitary animal that doesn’t form herds. Not so its rarer but nearest relative, Alces purplius, the Motley Moose. Though sometimes solitary, the Motley Moose herds in ever shifting groups at the local watering hole to exchange news and just pass the time.

 photo Moosewateringhole_zpsfce12127.jpg

The morning check-in is an open thread and general social hour.

It’s traditional but not obligatory to give us a weather check where you are and let us know what’s new, interesting, challenging or even routine in your life lately. Nothing is particularly obligatory here except:

Always remember the Moose Golden (Purple?) Rule:

Be kind to each other… or else.

What could be simpler than that, right?

 photo aaonefriend_zpsfcc3f757.jpg


Derailing discussions about racism and other “isms”




 photo Derailmentbingo_zps100f99e4.jpg

It wasn’t very long ago that I wrote about “microagressions“, aka “The stuff that piles up and wears you down”. After spending Mother’s Day dealing with a few wrong-headed micro-agressors who expended a lot of keyboard energy trying to derail discussion of the racial component in the coverage of the kidnappings in Nigeria, and media coverage of African countries-period-and then logging in yesterday to look at “youthful campus racism” against Native Americans, documented by Meteor Blades,  which isn’t coming from “old people” or from “the South”,  I thought it might be a good idea to dust off the Derailing for Dummies playbook for review.  

 photo Derailingfordummies_zpsaa3c667e.jpg

You can download it here.

We have a few more years to go with the sludge and slime of racial attacks against our President and his family, and though we haven’t even come near to the 2016 primary season, the sexism sewer is already bubbling.    

We already know that the right wing in this country is racist, sexist, homophobic, ageist, classist, ethnocentrist…what is more difficult to wrassle with is when elements of “isms” crop up within spaces we expect to embrace values that are the antithesis of wingnuttery.

Some of it is rooted in denial. Some in ignorance. It doesn’t make it any more comfortable to deal with. From my perspective it’s more difficult for us, since the effective building of political coalitions we need to effect change on issues of great import, are impeded by covert, and sometimes overt expressions of “isms” and the wearying process of continually having to wage struggle on multiple fronts.  

While dealing with it myself, on Sunday, I was relieved to have a commenter do an effective job of summing up the derailment of a discussion of racism that was taking place in this comment she made.

So if you are faced with derailing and denial from purported allies and friends, on a blog or on facebook, or in face-to-face discussions, as aggravating as it can be, or get caught up in it without even recognizing what is taking place, here are some handy tips, links and examples you might want to bookmark for future use.  

Abagond has a good piece based on derailing for dummies, and goes into a deeper discussion of how to figure out who you might be dealing with on the anonymous internet. Though not all racists black folks or other people of color are confronted by are white, and though white folks get called racist too (we have plenty examples of people from the Black Kos Community who are white, getting confronted with the same b.s. because of their active anti-racism), and yes, poc’s can be bigots too (though they don’t control systemic racism) much of the racist spewing does come from unenlightened white folks. He has a list of clues , which includes:

They bring up purple people: they say it does not matter to them if you are black, white, green or purple.

They bring up the Arab slave trade.

They point out that Africans sold and owned slaves.

They say their family never owned slaves.

They talk down to you like they know everything and you know nothing, like you are just imagining things.

They point out that Obama is half white.

They say that most crimes are committed by blacks.

They say they never got any help but made it on their own

Sigh. Cannot even begin to tell you how frequently I’ve had to read and reply to some of the things he’s listed.

  photo TheRaceCard_zps7735f57b.jpg

I’ve decided I’m simply going to post this graphic, from Feminocracy, as a reply to anyone who drags out ye olde “race card” accusation. Tired of explaining my life is not a card game, nor is the deadly and often fatal seriousness of systemic oppression.

Dealing with, discussing, and combating racism does not make me, or any other person fighting racism, “a racist”. Or that other hackneyed standard plaint, “a reverse racist”.

I do have an anecdote to share that gave me a chuckle yesterday. After having been called “bitter” and “a racist” for posing the question about the initial lack of media coverage of the kidnappings in Nigeria being related to the fact that the girls are black and African, not white, I had a surprise on my way to school on Monday.      

Had an interesting experience driving to work this morning.  I usually listen to a discussion program on my local Northeast public radio station – WAMC-FM. The morning Roundtable program often covers media, and how media cover different stories. One of the panelists, Libby Post raised the question, “what if the kidnapped girls were white?”.  

I admit I had to grin while driving, since after reading some of the comments from people who found my raising that question horrific, and somehow motivated by my black lens –  if was interesting to hear it raised by a white woman.  

Panelist Libby Post is an out lesbian (her blog is called Proudly Out), and has been attacked here in upstate New York frequently, for her views on white-straight-male privilege, and her critiques of racism hurled at the President and Sonia Sotomayor. The other woman, also white, on the panel was award winning journalist and journalism professor Rosemary Armao, who has extensive experience reporting on Eastern Europe and in Africa. She didn’t have any problem with exploring that premise, and agreeing that it was initially a key factor.  

I’m still smiling, I’ll continue to explore racism and all the other “isms” in my blog posts,  and teaching about them in the classroom. Those who persist in derailing attempts might want to stop and take a good look at themselves and read up on the game of bingo they are playing.

Cross-posted from Black Kos


Tuesday Morning Herd Check-in

  Make sure you let your peeps

  know where to find you!  


    PLEASE Do Not Recommend the check-in diary!
   

        Fierces on the Weather Critter Comment are obligatory welcome.

The morning check-in is an open thread posted to give you a place to visit with the meeses. Feel free to chat about your weather, share a bit of your life, grump (if you must), rave (if you can). The diarist du jour sometimes posts and runs, other times sticks around for a bit, often returns throughout the day and always cares that meeses are happy … or at least contented.

For those new to the Moose, Kysen left a Moose Welcome Mat (Part Deux) so, please, wipe your feet before you walk in the front door start posting.

The important stuff to get you started:

– Comments do not Auto-refresh. Click the refresh/reload on your tab to see new ones. Only click Post once for comments. When a diary’s comment threads grow, the page takes longer to refresh and the comment may not display right away.

– To check for replies to your comments, click the “My Comments” link in the right-hand column (or go to “My Moose”). Comments will be listed and a link to Recent Replies will be shown. (Note: Tending comments builds community)

– Ratings: Fierce means Thumbs Up, Fail means Thumbs Down, Meh means one of three things: I am unFailing you but I can’t Fierce you, I am unFiercing after a mistaken Fierce, … or Meh. Just Meh. (p.s. Ratings don’t bestow mojo, online behaviour does).

– The Recommended list has a prominent place on the Front Page because it reflects the interests of the Moose. When people drive-by, we want them to see what we are talking about: news, politics, science, history, personal stories, culture. The list is based on number of recs and days on the list. Per Kysen: “The best way to control Rec List content is to ONLY rec diaries you WANT to see ON the list.

– Finally, the posting rules for a new diary: “Be excellent to each other… or else

(Some other commenting/posting/tending notes for newbies can be found in this past check-in and, of course, consult Meese Mehta for all your questions on meesely decorum.)

You can follow the daily moosetrails here: Motley Moose Recent Comments.

~

So, what’s going on in your part of Moosesylvania??

~


Climate Change and Apocalypticism




 photo climate_zps9971c235.jpg


I’ve never really considered myself an environmentalist. I don’t live a particularly “green” life, though I recycle, don’t litter, and don’t leave lights on or other electronic devices running. But I increasingly find opposition to climate science (I don’t think they are skeptics as much as scoffers) infuriating.

I don’t even know quite what is motivating this post at the moment. But I have a family member with a science based Ph.D. who consistently raises his opposition to the findings of climate scientists every time he sees me. He argues that he’s “read the science” and that his work has always been about modeling and that the models they use cannot hope to capture the complexity of the phenomenon of climate change and that ultimately belief in anthropogenic climate change is nothing more than belief, even religious belief. This last point resonates with those who often compare the dire predictions of climate scientists and environmental activists to the apocalyptic speculation that has occurred so frequently across western history.

Now, apocalyptic speculation is something I actually know about. I can take you through Joachim of Fiore’s tripartite division of history and the ensuing distinctions between pre-millennial and post-millennial dispensationalisms. I’ve read Carion’s Chronicle and the Testament of Elias, which blended Jewish and Christian eschatologies in the 16th century and can hold forth on the role of the Fifth Monarchy men and Menassah Ben Israel’s The Hope of Israel in 17th century English politics. I can explain the kabbalistic underpinnings and talmudic calculations of Nathan of Gaza and Shabbtai Tzvi, and then the subsequent anti-nomian movement of Jakob Frank. And I can testify that climate science has nothing to do with these imaginative extrapolations of prophetic texts into particular historical contexts.

Climate science isn’t about applying authoritative religious texts to historical contexts in apocalyptic, i.e. revelatory ways. It’s based on the best interpretations of observable phenomena and employs the scientific method. Sure, predictive modeling is not as precise an application of the scientific method as the diagnosis of cause. It entails more inference. And if the scientific method never claims to be beyond the possibility of error, predictive modeling is an application with even more potential to get it wrong until it self-corrects. And yet, if 97% of cardiologists agreed that I needed a surgical procedure or my cardio-vascular system would blow itself out within a short time, and that this situation was already one they would classify as an emergency, would I hesitate? Would you? It wouldn’t mean that they were correct beyond any doubt or that the procedure would succeed. It would mean that they were far more likely to be correct than not and that the procedure would be far more likely to engender health than impair it. Would any of us dismiss them as a self-interested and/or self-deluding community of mystics?

I accept that global climate history is an exponentially more complex system even than the body’s cardio-vascular system. And I don’t think any form of science should be accepted uncritically or without true skepticism. For the scientific method requires a healthy skepticism as constitutive of the mechanism of its process. I don’t suggest anyone accept authority blindly. But if 97% of cardiologists told me I needed that procedure immediately, would it be wise to say “hold on, I’m going to med school and then do a cardiology fellowship and read all the journals and analyze the methodologies of every article on the subject and then get back to you”? Science entails humility, the humility to admit that we may be wrong on this or that point and that we are certainly going to be wrong on some points. It entails respect for the scientific community, even as we acknowledge its fallibility. Healthy skepticism among lay folk within a democracy means not accepting the findings of a particular researcher, no matter their reputation, on its own. It means listening to more voices within a community of authorities.

So let’s go back. And let’s get a bit more dramatic. If 40% of cardiologists were to tell me that my son’s heart murmur was dangerous and required an invasive procedure, I would certainly be concerned, to hazard an understatement. And I would have to consider the minority opinion as significant. I might not have the procedure done. But I certainly would begin to consider it. If 51% were to tell me that, I’d consider it seriously, even knowing that almost half the community of authorities, of trained experts, believes otherwise. If 60%, I’d have trouble gambling on the 40% being right, even as I’d acknowledge the healthy possibility. At what point would I sign the consent form without hesitation? 65%? 70%? 75%? Would anyone in this situation really require 97% before consenting, even if consent entailed hazard and even if the procedure required significant sacrifice?


Motley Monday Check in and Mooselaneous Musings

 photo Monday3_zpsc08d979e.jpg

  Good morning Motley Meese! Hope your weekend was lovely.


  PLEASE Don’t Recommend the check-in diary!
 

        Fierces on the weather jar comment are still welcome.

The check-in is an open thread and general social hour.

It’s traditional but not obligatory to give us a weather check where you are and let us know what’s new, interesting, challenging or even routine in your life lately. Nothing is particularly obligatory here except:

Always remember the Moose Golden (Purple?) Rule:

Be kind to each other… or else.

What could be simpler than that, right?

 photo aamomcat_zpsb738de2b.jpg