Motley Moose – Archive

Since 2008 – Progress Through Politics

Breaking Barriers. Remembering Harry S. McAlpin




 photo HarryMcAlpin_zps5a45d7a7.jpg

One of the most interesting positive events on the racial history front to garner some national press attention last week was the highlighting of the life and career of Harry S. McAlpin.  

The African American Registry (of course) had the event marked as part of our history, but I’m elated to see that this history has been exposed to a much wider audience.

Date:

Tue, 1944-02-08

On this date in 1944, Harry S. McAlpin was the first African American journalist admitted to a white house press conference.

He was working for the National Negro Press Association and the Atlanta Daily World. On that day, McAlpin was waiting to go into the Oval Office, where they had press conferences at that time, when a white reporter from the New Orleans Times-Picayune spoke to him. The reporter who was head of the White House Press Correspondents Association said, “Harry, we’re not happy that you’re here, but we can’t stop you from going to these press conferences. However, if you don’t go to these press conferences, we will come out afterward and we will tell you everything that happened. You will have the exact same notes we do. You will find it possible to write the same stories that we do. And, if you don’t go, we will let you join the White House Press Correspondents Association.”

McAlpin went into the press conference and at the end of it he made a point of going by President Franklin Roosevelt’s desk. Roosevelt shook McAlpin’s hand and said, “Harry, I’m glad to have you here.” In 1947, the Negro Newspaper Publishers association and some individual news correspondents were accredited to the Congressional Press Galleries and the State Department. The early journalists accredited were James L. Hicks, Percival L. Prattis and Louis Lautier.

There was a flurry of stories like this one below, and others from

AP , thanks to the coverage of President Obama’s remarks, but I think it is important that we not only remember McAlpin, but look at how far we have come since the 40’s and how far we need to go.


Tue, 1944-02-08

On this date in 1944, Harry S. McAlpin was the first African American journalist admitted to a white house press conference.

He was working for the National Negro Press Association and the Atlanta Daily World. On that day, McAlpin was waiting to go into the Oval Office, where they had press conferences at that time, when a white reporter from the New Orleans Times-Picayune spoke to him. The reporter who was head of the White House Press Correspondents Association said, “Harry, we’re not happy that you’re here, but we can’t stop you from going to these press conferences. However, if you don’t go to these press conferences, we will come out afterward and we will tell you everything that happened. You will have the exact same notes we do. You will find it possible to write the same stories that we do. And, if you don’t go, we will let you join the White House Press Correspondents Association.”

McAlpin went into the press conference and at the end of it he made a point of going by President Franklin Roosevelt’s desk. Roosevelt shook McAlpin’s hand and said, “Harry, I’m glad to have you here.” In 1947, the Negro Newspaper Publishers association and some individual news correspondents were accredited to the Congressional Press Galleries and the State Department. The early journalists accredited were James L. Hicks, Percival L. Prattis and Louis Lautier.

There was a flurry of stories like this one below, and others from AP , thanks to the coverage of President Obama’s remarks, but I think it is important that we not only remember McAlpin, but look at how far we have come since the 40’s and how far we need to go.

White House reporters to right WWII-era racism

Seventy years ago, Harry S. McAlpin, a reporter for The Atlanta Daily World and other African American newspapers – and a future president of the Louisville NAACP – became the first black reporter to cover a presidential news conference at the White House. President Franklin D. Roosevelt invited McAlpin into one of his twice-a-week gatherings with the all-white White House press corps after repeated requests from African-American publishers, who had complained about being denied access.

Thomma told me the White House Correspondents’ Association had blocked black reporters from FDR’s news conferences. And the group’s members resented McAlpin’s presence in their midst. McAlpin told The Courier-Journal in 1964 that one of the correspondents urged him not to go into the Feb. 8, 1944, briefing, that he might step on the foot of a white reporter “and there might be a race riot.” “I told him that if there was going to be a race riot in a group like that over a little thing like that – why it would be the greatest Negro news story of the year and I wouldn’t want to miss it,” McAlpin said. “He went in and made history,” Thomma said. “But he never was admitted to the White House Correspondents Association.”

McAlpin left the White House beat in 1945 and covered the final months of World War II. Originally from St. Louis, he moved to Louisville in 1949, practiced law, became a civil-rights activist and ultimately head of the Louisville chapter of the NAACP. He died in 1985. Now the White House Correspondents’ Association is naming a journalism scholarship after him. The first recipient was scheduled to be introduced at the Saturday dinner and meet President Barack Obama. McAlpin’s son, Sherman, of Bowie, Md., his wife and daughter were invited as guests, too. “As we mark our centennial, we were determined to remember both the good and the bad of those 100 years. Our treatment of Harry McAlpin was part of the bad,” Condon told me. “But today, 70 years later, we hope this brings some attention to the remarkable work that he did.”

President Obama’s remarks at the dinner about McAlpin:

On a more serious note, tonight reminds us that we really are lucky to live in a country where reporters get to give a head of state a hard time on a daily basis — and then, once a year, give him or her the chance, at least, to try to return the favor.  

But we also know that not every journalist, or photographer, or crewmember is so fortunate, because even as we celebrate the free press tonight, our thoughts are with those in places around the globe like Ukraine, and Afghanistan, and Syria, and Egypt, who risk everything — in some cases, even give their lives — to report the news.

And what tonight also reminds us is that the fight for full and fair access goes beyond the chance to ask a question.  As Steve mentioned, decades ago, an African American who wanted to cover his or her President might be barred from journalism school, burdened by Jim Crow, and, once in Washington, banned from press conferences.  But after years of effort, black editors and publishers began meeting with FDR’s press secretary, Steve Early.  And then they met with the President himself, who declared that a black reporter would get a credential.  And even when Harry McAlpin made history as the first African American to attend a presidential news conference, he wasn’t always welcomed by the other reporters.  But he was welcomed by the President, who told him, I’m glad to see you, McAlpin, and I’m very happy to have you here.

Now, that sentiment might have worn off once Harry asked him a question or two — (laughter) — and Harry’s battles continued.  But he made history.  And we’re proud of Sherman and his family for being here tonight, and the White House Correspondents Association for creating a scholarship in Harry’s name.  (Applause.)

McAlpin’s story is part of the history of the black press in the U.S. Few people know the name of men like  John H. Sengstacke.

b. 1912 He was the visionary publisher of The Chicago Daily Defender, an influential newspaper in black communities nationwide. Sengstacke bedeviled Roosevelt and Truman and had access to the White House until his death. But he avoided publicity, preferring to let the clout of his paper do the talking.

Integration was a blessing and curse. It broadened opportunity and dismantled American apartheid. But it swept away some of the most substantial institutions that African-Americans had ever controlled. Negro colleges faltered and some collapsed when white schools integrated and skimmed off the black middle class. Inner-city churches, civic groups and neighborhoods came unraveled as affluent Negroes fled through newly opened doors to the suburbs. No institution worked harder for desegregation — or suffered more gravely when it arrived — than the 300 or so newspapers that made up the Negro press. Throughout the first half of the century, legendary papers like The Chicago Defender, The Pittsburgh Courier and The Baltimore Afro-American had campaigned against discrimination in housing, in the military and in public accommodations. But with the civil rights movement finally under way — and white papers belatedly interested in Negro news — black readers slipped steadily away, leaving the Negro press to wither.

Only in the last 10 years have historians begun to explore this period. But with the barest outlines of the story in place, the Charles Foster Kane of the Negro press has already emerged. He was John H. Sengstacke, an immensely powerful but almost reclusive man who led The Chicago Defender for nearly 60 years, until his death last summer. For all of his power and exploits, the public record suggests that he barely existed. But Sengstacke was not just a publisher; he was a national power center.

Few know of the charges of sedition levelled againt the black press in wartime.

( 25 November 1912, Savannah, Ga.– ). John H. Sengstacke, publisher of the Chicago Defender and founder of the Negro Newspaper Publishers’ Association ( NNPA), helped save the black press from being shut down for seditious libel during World War II. He joined the staff of the Defender in 1934 as the assistant to its founder and his uncle, Robert S. Abbott. Shortly before the United States’ entrance into the Second World War, he succeeded his uncle as publisher and editor.

Throughout the war period, the Defender, like other African-American publications, criticized the treatment of black servicemen and advocated the integration of the armed forces. When the federal government considered indicting black publishers for sedition in order to silence the black press, Sengstacke worked out a compromise with the Justice Department. According to the deal, black newspapers would tone down their criticism and be more cooperative with the war effort if black journalists were given access to government officials. Sengstacke, as president of the NNPA, also helped gain accreditation for Harry S. McAlpin, the first black White House correspondent.

McAlpin’s career didn’t end when he stopped covering the news.

McAlpin’s Later Career

McAlpin was practicing law in Louisville, Kentucky where he previously had been chairman of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. In April he was one of the two leaders who were spearheading a protest against the board of aldermen in Louisville who voted down an ordinance that would have opened more neighborhoods to African-American citizens.  McAlpin issued a statement that advocated boycotting of Louisville businesses in protest of what he called an “insult to Negro intelligence.”

By 1968 he had returned to Washington, D.C. to work as a hearing officer for the Social Security Administration. Later he was in the news again for being named the “first Negro hearing examiner for the Agricultural Department.” The date was October 10, 1971; McAlpin was 65 at the time.

Later he returned to his law practice in Louisville.

(From the Encyclopedia of African-American Civil Rights:From Emancipation to the Present. Charles D. Lowery – Editor, John F. Marszalek – Editor. Page 472)

McAlpin was interviewed by Edward R. Murrow, for his radio program “This I Believe” in the 1950’s.


I had a father who regrettably died when I was fifteen years old and a senior in high school. He was a man of great principle. He abhorred injustice. He believed, in spite of the handicaps he suffered because of his color, that all men were created equal in the sight of God, and that included him and me. He instilled me with his beliefs. To live by these beliefs, I have found it necessary to develop patience, to build courage, to pray for wisdom. But despite my fervent prayers, I find it is not always easy to live up to my creed.

The complexities of modern-day living-particularly as I must face them day to day as a Negro in America-often put my creed to test. It takes a great deal of patience to accept the customs of some sections and communities, to try to fit into the crossword puzzle of living the illogic of a practice that will permit me to ride on the public buses without segregation and seating, but deny me the right to rent a private room to myself in a hotel; or the illogic of a practice which will accept me as a chauffeur for the rich who can afford it, but deny me the opportunity of driving one of the public buses I may ride indiscriminately; or the illogic of a practice which will accept me and require me to fight on the same battlefield but deny me the right to ride in the same coach on a train.

It takes a great deal of courage to put principles of right and justice ahead of economic welfare and well-being, to stand up and challenge established and accepted practices, which amount to arbitrary exercise of power by petty politicians in office or by the police. Trying to live up to my beliefs often has subjected me to both praise and criticism. How wise I have been in my choices may be known only to God. I firmly believe, however, that as an American, as a man, and as a Christian, I have been strengthened, and life about me has been made better, by the steel hardening fires through which my creed and my faith have carried me.

I shall continue to pray, therefore, a prayer I learned in the distant past, which I now count as my own: “God, give me serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference.”

 photo AliceAllisonDunnigan_zps504cd56d.jpg

The first black woman to become a white house correspondent was Alice Allison Dunnigan.

Dunnigan reported on Congressional hearings where blacks were referred to as “niggers,” was barred from covering a speech by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in a whites-only theater, and was not allowed to sit with the press to cover Senator Robert A. Taft’s funeral – she covered the event from a seat in the servant’s section. Dunnigan was known for her straight-shooting reporting style. Politicians routinely avoided answering her difficult questions, which often involved race issues.

During her years covering the White House, Dunnigan suffered many of the racial indignities of the time, but also earned a reputation as a hard-hitting reporter. She was barred from entering certain establishments to cover President Eisenhower, and had to sit with the servants to cover Senator Taft’s funeral. When she attended formal White House functions, she was mistaken for the wife of a visiting dignitary; no one could imagine a black woman attending such an event on her own. During Eisenhower’s two administrations, the president resorted first to not calling on her and later to asking for her questions beforehand because she was known to ask such difficult questions, often about race. No other member of the press corps was required to submit their questions before a press conference, and Dunnigan refused. When Kennedy took office, he welcomed Dunnigan’s tough questions and answered them frankly.

Her autobiography, “A Black woman’s experience: From schoolhouse to White House” is not readily available to purchase.

For more of this history, suggest you see if your library has “A History of the Black Press“, by Armistead Scott Pride, and Clint C. Wilson

 photo HistoryoftheBlackPress_zpsc27ee4c6.jpg

In this work, Dr. Wilson chronicles the development of black newspapers in New York City and draws parallels to the development of presses in Washington, D.C., and in 46 of the 50 United States. He describes the involvement of the press with civil rights and the interaction of black and nonblack columnists who contributed to black- and white-owned newspapers.

We tend to take seeing black faces in traditional news media positions of visibility for granted these days.  I won’t forget people like Max Robinson , who broke the color barrier on prime time news in 1978 , or Bernard Shaw who anchored at CNN starting in 1980.

Bob Herbert, became the first black op-ed columnist at the New York Times, in June of 1993.

Nowadays we have other options. We are here in the blogosphere and very vocal on twitter.

Black voices will be heard.

Cross-posted from Black Kos


National Climate Assessment Report released by the White House

From the White House Science Guy, Dr. John P. Holdren:

Hi, everyone —

Today, we released the third National Climate Assessment report, by far the most comprehensive look ever at climate change impacts in the United States.

Based on four years of work by hundreds of experts from government, academia, corporations, and public-interest organizations, the Assessment confirms abundant data and examples that climate change isn’t some distant threat — it’s affecting us now.

Not only are the planet and the nation warming on average, but a number of types of extreme weather events linked to climate change have become more frequent or intense in many regions, including heat waves, droughts, heavy downpours, floods, and some kinds of destructive storms.

The good news is that there are sensible steps that we can take to protect this country and the planet.

Those steps include, importantly, the three sets of actions making up the Climate Action Plan that President Obama announced last June: cutting carbon pollution in America; increasing preparedness for and resilience to the changes in climate that already are ongoing; and leading the international response to the climate change challenge.

We’ve made great progress in the year since his announcement — but there’s much more work to be done.

Watch this short video to learn more about the new report and see how climate change is affecting people across the United States today:

Explore the full report, and find out how you can help — because every one of us has to do his or her part to meet the challenge of climate change.

Thank you,

John

Dr. John P. Holdren

Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy

The White House

Climate Change And President Obama’s Action Plan

The National Climate Assessment

On May 6, the Administration released the Third U.S. National Climate Assessment, the most authoritative and comprehensive source of scientific information to date about climate-change impacts across all U.S. regions and on critical sectors of the economy.

The report, a key deliverable of President Obama’s Climate Action Plan, confirms that climate change is not a distant threat – it’s affecting us now.

GlobalChange.gov

Today, delivering on our legal mandate and the President’s Climate Action Plan, the U.S. Global Change Research Program released the Third National Climate Assessment, the most comprehensive, authoritative, transparent scientific report on U.S. climate change impacts ever generated.

The report confirms that climate change is affecting every region of the country and key sectors of the U.S. economy and society, underscoring the need to combat the threats climate change presents and increase the preparedness and resilience of American communities.

The Third National Climate Assessment is available to download and can be explored interactively through our newly redeployed website. In this mobile-compatible site, every piece of the report is shareable, including graphics, key messages, regional highlights, full chapters, and more. More broadly, the new site features accessible and dynamic information, topical call-outs, resources, and news about global change and related Federal research and engagement efforts.

The findings of the Third National Climate Assessment are fully traceable and supported by metadata through the Global Change Information System (GCIS), a new gateway to Federal global change information that delivers on goals set in USGCRP’s 2012-2021 Strategic Plan. The GCIS enables traceability between environmental data streams (such as observations from sensors and outputs from models) and the resulting scientific findings and publications. Going forward, the GCIS is intended to expand to provide this traceability for other key reports.


Tuesday Morning Herd Check-in

  Make sure you let your peeps

  know where to find you!  


    PLEASE Do Not Recommend the check-in diary!
   

        Fierces on the Weather Critter Comment are obligatory welcome.

The morning check-in is an open thread posted to give you a place to visit with the meeses. Feel free to chat about your weather, share a bit of your life, grump (if you must), rave (if you can). The diarist du jour sometimes posts and runs, other times sticks around for a bit, often returns throughout the day and always cares that meeses are happy … or at least contented.

For those new to the Moose, Kysen left a Moose Welcome Mat (Part Deux) so, please, wipe your feet before you walk in the front door start posting.

The important stuff to get you started:

– Comments do not Auto-refresh. Click the refresh/reload on your tab to see new ones. Only click Post once for comments. When a diary’s comment threads grow, the page takes longer to refresh and the comment may not display right away.

– To check for replies to your comments, click the “My Comments” link in the right-hand column (or go to “My Moose”). Comments will be listed and a link to Recent Replies will be shown. (Note: Tending comments builds community)

– Ratings: Fierce means Thumbs Up, Fail means Thumbs Down, Meh means one of three things: I am unFailing you but I can’t Fierce you, I am unFiercing after a mistaken Fierce, … or Meh. Just Meh. (p.s. Ratings don’t bestow mojo, online behaviour does).

– The Recommended list has a prominent place on the Front Page because it reflects the interests of the Moose. When people drive-by, we want them to see what we are talking about: news, politics, science, history, personal stories, culture. The list is based on number of recs and days on the list. Per Kysen: “The best way to control Rec List content is to ONLY rec diaries you WANT to see ON the list.

– Finally, the posting rules for a new diary: “Be excellent to each other… or else

(Some other commenting/posting/tending notes for newbies can be found in this past check-in and, of course, consult Meese Mehta for all your questions on meesely decorum.)

You can follow the daily moosetrails here: Motley Moose Recent Comments.

~

So what’s going on in your neck of Moosesylvania??

~


Odds & Ends: News/Humor

I post a weekly diary of historical notes, arts & science items, foreign news (often receiving little notice in the US) and whimsical pieces from the outside world that I often feature in “Cheers & Jeers”.

OK, you’ve been warned – here is this week’s tomfoolery material that I posted.

ART NOTES – an exhibition entitled Caribbean: Crossroads of the World – with paintings, sculptures, photographs and videos from the Haitian Revolution to the present – is at the Pérez Art Museum in Miami, Florida to August 17th.

MORE THAN 600 YEARS ago, the poet Geoffrey Chaucer died without completing his greatest masterpiece, The Canterbury Tales – more than 20 stories (originally written in Middle English) – but now, these have been published online for the first time.

HAIL and FAREWELL to two musicians of note: the bassist in the Atlanta Rhythm Section, Paul Goddard – who has died at the age of 68 … and guitarist Larry Ramos – a member of The Association – who has died at the age of 72.

THURSDAY’s CHILD was named Lucky the Cat – after being found by a supermarket employee bound-up (in an adjacent glass-recycling bin) in the north of England …. and it seems she has now has been reunited with her family (under her real name, Piper).

BRAIN TEASER – try this Quiz of the Week’s News from the BBC.

THE OTHER NIGHT yours truly hosted the Top Comments diary with a follow-up to several earlier stories: on the explorer Ernest Shackleton, the upcoming “Man from U.N.C.L.E.” movie … and the continuing inquest into the deaths of 96 people in England’s sports tragedy, the “Hillsborough Disaster”.

FRIDAY’s CHILD is Cami the Cat – who jumped out of her crate when her family was moving from New Hampshire to Maine three months ago … then was found under a truck, near death …. but recovered, and was reunited with her family due to a microchip.

LITERARY NOTES – Forensic scientists in Spain have announced plans to search a Madrid convent for the body of the 17th Century author, Miguel de Cervantes – using ground-penetrating radar – in order to properly memorialize the author of “Don Quixote”.

ACCORDING to the veteran actor Mandy Pantinkin, “Not a day of my life goes by that I don’t get asked to say” … Inigo Montoya’s famous line “Prepare to die” line from “The Princess Bride”.

By Request FATHER-SON? from Tonga 23 – the late TV star Andy Griffith and the Alaska Senator Mark Begichwhaddya think?

 

…… and finally, for a song of the week ……………………. from the British side of the mid-to-late 70’s punk scene, one had many choices: the envelope-pushing of the Sex Pistols, the high-end sound of The Clash, the Oi! bands such as Angelic Upstarts and more humorous acts like Ian Dury. But my favorite was Sham 69 – and compared to their more middle-class contemporaries (Joe Strummer of The Clash was a diplomat’s son) they actually represented the wave of working-class angst over unemployment at the time. Sham 69 had a sound that was raw, yet had a playful (even melodic) sound at times, and their choruses featured a sing-along quality that … well, made an audience want to sing-along.

They were formed in the working-class suburb of Hersham (about 16 miles south-west of London) in late 1975 by lead singer and frontman Jimmy Pursey and after awhile, guitarist Dave Parsons. The name came from a local football (soccer) team’s championship written on a wall: “Walton and Hersham ’69” had started to fade … so that only the last few characters could be seen.

Their song lyrics were populist and filled with Cockney references – which eventually gained them a loyal following in London. Their first independent single “I Don’t Wanna” was produced by the Velvet Underground’s John Cale – which led to their being signed by Polydor. Over the next few years they had several singles in the UK charts: “If the Kids are United”, “We Got a Fight”, “Hurry Up Harry”, “Angels with Dirty Faces” and their famous ode to the (now defunct) British youth prison system, (There’s Gonna Be A) Borstal Breakout.

The rhythm section often had personnel changes, before the band settled into what is considered their classic lineup: with bassist Dave Tregunna and drummer Ricky Goldstein by 1979. And I had a chance to see this band in New York in early 1980: as Jimmy Pursey would sing from ‘Borstal Breakout’ the line, “When I’ve done these things – I’ve done ’em just for you!” – with him pointing at the audience, who were doing the same to him. He also sang the title of “Cockney Kids are Innocent” as “The Hostages are Innocent” – referencing the then-ongoing Iran hostage crisis – which endeared the band to us in the audience, as you might imagine in those very dark days.

As mentioned their sound matured over time – with even a nice version of the Hugg Brothers song “(Mister) You’re a Better Man than I” – which the Yardbirds made famous – and which at this link you can hear for yourself.  

But even though the band’s politics were somewhat left-of-center: their rowdy, sing-along style had the misfortune of drawing an audience that – at least in the UK – were made up in part of skinheads and the then-burgeoning racist National Front party. The ensuing violence at their shows made it difficult for the band to continue, and they split later in 1980.

Jimmy Pursey briefly joined a lineup featuring Steve Jones and Paul Cook of the Sex Pistols (the “Sham Pistols” was the name given to them) and then went into TV appearances for awhile. Dave Parsons and Dave Tregunna joined former Dead Boys vocalist Stiv Bators – before Tregunna left to join the Lords of the New Church for several years in the 1980’s.

In 1987, Pursey, Parsons and Tregunna decided to reform Sham 69 – and this line-up continued off-and-on until 2006, when they had a personal parting of the ways. Dave Parsons continued with a new version of the band while Jimmy Pursey formed Day 21 including bassist Mat Sargent (a member of Sham 69 for a few years in the late 90’s).

In 2011, the band re-formed once again – and while not an active band, they do have some shows in England this summer. For a compilation Sham 69 album, 2004’s The Complete Collection is a comprehensive one.

A supremely talented lineup of musicians this never was; even at their best their songs were never ambitious. But except for the violence at their UK shows: if you wanted a fun band with whom you could sing-along and also happened to speak to an audience with working-class roots: you could do worse than listen to Sham 69. Make that far worse.

   

While “Borstal Breakout” was my early favorite (and for many people) I later embraced their 1979 Hersham Boys (fair-use extract below) title track of the Adventures of the Hersham Boys album: at #8 their highest-charting UK hit single.

It has all of their normal elements: referring to the “Bow Bells” (the bells of St Mary-le-Bow Church in London; the epicenter of Cockney accents), a football-stadium quality sing-a-long chorus, references to UK public housing … and a shout-out (literally) to their hometown of Hersham – and thus symbolic of the band’s early days. It also suggests “Cockney cowboys” with a country-music instrumental break that seems both out-of-place … and yet an essential part of this tune. And below you can listen to it.

Living each day outside the law

Trying not to do what we did before

Country slang with the Bow Bell boys

So close to the city – we ain’t got much choice!

Council estates or tower blocks

Wherever you live, you get the knocks

But the people ’round here, they are so nice

“Stop being naughty; take our advice!”

Hersham boys, Hersham boys

Lace-up boots and corduroys

Hersham boys, Hersham boys

They call us the Cockney cowboys!


A Humble Petition for Public Prayer in Light of Today’s Supreme Court Ruling

I humbly propose that the following invocation be given whenever a public meeting in the City of New York (and anywhere else that seeks to adopt it) is convened:

May Hashem’s wisdom guide us and may His laws guide us.  May we take on more mitzvot [commandments] and may we therefore merit the coming of Moshiach, bim’hera v’yameinu.  Amen.

After all, if this prayer:

Lord, God of all creation, we give you thanks and praise for your presence and action in the world. We look with anticipation to the celebration of Holy Week and Easter. It is in the solemn events of next week that we find the very heart and center of our Chris­ tian faith. We acknowledge the saving sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross. We draw strength, vitality, and confidence from his resurrection at Easter. . . . We pray for peace in the world, an end to terrorism, violence, conflict, and war. We pray for stability, de­ mocracy, and good government in those countries in which our armed forces are now serving, especially in Iraq and Afghanistan. . . . Praise and glory be yours, O Lord, now and forever more. Amen.

meets constitutional scrutiny for public governmental meetings, then the prayer I so humbly propose should meet that scrutiny as well.

Of course, I somehow doubt that the five justices that effectively declared today it was okay to effectively establish Christianity as the religion of state simply because the majority of Americans practice it would find a prayer so overtly Jewish acceptable.  Similarly, a prayer overtly Muslim or of any other religion would also not meet their scrutiny.  And those that scream loudest in favor of the prayer offered by clerics at the public meetings of the Town of Greece, New York, would scream for the separation of religion and state the moment a sectarian non-Christian prayer was offered.

Oh, and one more thing.  Justice Thomas reiterated his belief today that the Establishment Clause protects state establishments of religion and merely prohibits the federal government from establishing a national religion.  I would love to see a state establish a non-Christian religion as its state religion and then see if Justice Thomas possesses the courage of his convictions or if those beliefs only apply when a state adopts some form of Christianity as its state religion.


Your Daily Dose of [(Misinformation)(Paranoia)(Both)]

I happened to stumble across this web site:

“Your Daily Dose of Conservatism.”

I read the top-most article.

Here, we have the story of how the Bureau of Land Management has mutated into a rogue agency and an Agent of the Regime and how it has a license to steal.  "[T]he BLM has become a personal extension of our imperial leadership."

[/Aside:  I thought that going rogue was something admirable.  At least that is what Sarah Palin told me…. / End Aside]  

“BLM calls itself a management agency but they also have the ability, through FLTFA., to purchase land and a policy of forcing a sale to them at condemned land prices. They have a variety of weapons to use against the American public, including conservation, endangered species and permit refusal. BLM can and does turn valuable land into worthless wilderness through their bureaucratic extortion.”

According to the author, allowing “valuable” land to return to its natural state makes it a worthless wilderness.  That’s a pretty narrow definition of value.

Moreover, from what I understand, a lot of Western agriculture would not have been possible in the first place without large-scale, federally underwritten water projects.  And even with that vast infrastructure, what has been standard procedure for many decades may not be sustainable given the growth in population and the demands for water for non-agricultural uses.

More on this paragraph in a minute, but first…

“Rep Rob Bishop of Utah recently obtained a copy of the BLM secret planning document which exposes BLM as a rogue agency, with a hidden agenda.”

OK, I’ve read the portion of the document presented at the linked page.  It’s the beginning of a 20-page document about how the BLM intends to manage its lands.  But before we get to the beginning of the actual BLM secret document, we are greeted with a scary picture of a pack of wild horses being chased by a helicopter.  (I have reproduced the image at the top of this diary.]

No information is provided as to who is in the helicopter.  It seems to me that it may be just as likely, if not more likely, that the guys in the helicopter are poachers rounding up wild horses for a slaughterhouse than Fish and Wildlife Service personnel trying to move the horses from point A to point B for sound wildife-management reasons.

But suppose there are in fact BLM personnel in that helicopter.  Are there sound reasons for using helicopters for this purpose?  What alternatives are there to using helicopters?  A bunch of cowboys on horseback?  How many cowboys would the job require?  Would it cost more to field that group of X cowboys on horseback than to use a single helicopter?  Would there be greater risk of injury to the wild horses from roping them and forcing them to migrate?

(At least one of you Moose is an equestrienne.  I suspect that you may have answers to my questions.)

It would be interesting to know how this picture came to be taken.  Did someone just happen to be out in the wilderness when the BLM helicopter swooped in on a pack of wild horses?  Do we really know that the horses are wild?  Is it possible that the entire scene was staged for the purpose of getting a photograph?

[ /Aside: I seem to recall that the Queen of Conservatism has defended (and facilitated) the use of aircraft for one particular form of “wildlife management.”

http://www.scientificamerican….

http://www.slate.com/articles/…

The latter reported:

Helicopters have the benefit of being able to hover very close to the ground, but they’re prohibitively expensive for private pilots. (A small helicopter might cost as much as four times more than a Super Cub.) This past spring, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game lent its helicopters and employees to the predator-control effort.

/End Aside]

If one takes the trouble to read the beginning of the “secret” document, it doesn’t sound sinister at all… not to me, anyway.

Rather, from what I get out of the document, BLM is attempting to manage its lands in a systemic fashion rather than taking a piecemeal approach.

To the extent that lands form natural ecosystems, the BLM is attempting to manage the lands in a holistic, science-based  fashion so that the ecosystems function as Nature (and Nature’s God?) intend them to function, and so that rare, valuable and threatened species can survive.

Ecosystems need to be large enough that there is adequate space, water, forage, etc. for the species that inhabit the ecosystem.  Wildlife preserves also need to be contiguous.  They do not function well if, e.g., winter and summer habitats are separated by developed areas, open-pit mines, highways, etc.

To, also, although the article describes the document as “secret” and the “agenda” as “hidden,”  apparently, the only evidence of these allegations is that the document is marked, “Internal Draft – NOT FOR RELEASE.”  [Emphasis in original.]

Many organizations, both inside and outside of government, do not release drafts of policy statements and the like.  Rather, it is final versions that have gone through the necessary levels of review and that have received the necessary approvals that get released.

E.g., one of the exemptions from disclosure in the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552(A)(5) is, “inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency.”

As the federal government’s FOIA web site, puts it:

Not all records can be released under the FOIA.  Congress established certain categories of information that are not required to be released in response to a FOIA request because release would be harmful to governmental or private interests.   These categories are called “exemptions” from disclosures.  Still, even if an exemption applies, agencies may use their discretion to release information when there is no foreseeable harm in doing so and disclosure is not otherwise prohibited by law.  There are nine categories of exempt information and each is described below.  

[….]

Exemption 5: Information that concerns communications within or between agencies which are protected by legal privileges, that include but are not limited to:

[….]

3. Deliberative Process Privilege

[….]

The article does not say whether a final version was released.

Nevertheless, it is clear from this statement that, rather than some secret power-grab, the BLM would seek authority through statutory and rule-making processes to implement its plans.

Section I of the draft document states that, [t]o achieve our Treasured Land objectives, the BLM will need to enlist the aid of the administration and the Congress to ensure that we possess both the legal tools and financial means to make our vision of integrated landscape-level management a reality.”

During such processes, the public at large and interested parties in particular would have opportunities to make their views known: through testimony at Congressional-Committee hearings, and through comments and other pleadings filed during any legally necessary rule-making.

The lead article, states that, “BLM calls itself a management agency but they also have the ability, through FLTFA,  to purchase land and a policy of forcing a sale to them at condemned land prices. However, if we look at the linked page, we see that:

Under the provisions of FLTFA, the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the National Park Service (the Agencies) could only purchase inholdings that are located within a federally designated area, or that are adjacent to a federally designated area and contain exceptional resources.

With the definitions…

Inholding: Any right, title, or interest held by a non-federal entity, in or to a tract of land that lies within the boundary of a federally designated area.

Federally designated area:  An area, in existence on July 25, 2000, set aside for special management, including national parks, a national wildlife refuges, national forests, national monuments, national conservation areas, areas of critical environmental concern, national outstanding natural areas, national natural landmarks, research natural areas, wilderness or wilderness study areas, and units of the Wild and Scenic Rivers System or National Trails System.

Exceptional resource: A resource of scientific, natural, historic, cultural or recreational value that has been documented by a federal, state, or local government authority, and for which there is a compelling need for conservation and protection under the jurisdiction of a federal agency in order to maintain the resource for the benefit of the public.

And if we read a little further…

BECAUSE FLTFA HAS EXPIRED THE AGENCIES ARE NOT ACCEPTING NOMINATIONS OF LANDS FOR ACQUISITION USING FLTFA FUNDS.  THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR HISTORICAL PURPOSES AND POSSIBLE USE SHOULD FLTFA BE REAUTHORIZED.


Finally, with regard to a sale at “forcing a sale at condemned land prices,” the linked FTLA page states, immediately above the above-quoted text:

Lands meeting the above criteria could be nominated for sale to the Agencies by any individual, group or governmental body.  If submitted by a party other than the landowner, the nomination must also have been signed by the landowner(s) to confirm their willingness to sell.  The specific procedures for submitting nominations are outlined in the Federal Register Notice that was published on March 7, 2006.  The nomination and identification of an inholding does not obligate the landowner to convey the property nor does it obligate the United States to purchase the property.  All purchases must be at fair market value consistent with applicable provisions of the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions. [Emphasis added.]

(I also note that the author classifies conservation as a weapon.  And here I thought that Dick Cheney once said that conservation was a personal virtue.)

In sum, it seems to me that this Daily Dose is a dollop of paranoia, combined with either willful ignorance or deliberate distortion.


The Party of Lincoln? Er, no.

On Sunday morning, the above-the-fold headline in the Wisconsin State Journal, the paper of record for the State of Wisconsin, declared “Assembly members against secession”.

Let’s ignore for a moment how low the bar for political sanity has been set if the paper is reporting as NEWS(!) that the Republican caucus in the state assembly is not in favor of Wisconsin seceding from the Union.

Let’s also ignore the fact that not all of the Republicans in the state assembly signed the letter that Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R) sent to the delegates meeting this weekend at the Wisconsin State GOP Convention. Because it makes me cringe to think that my fellow Wisconsinites would elect state representatives who don’t even believe in the United States Constitution.

Instead, let’s look at Speaker Vos’ explanation for why the Republican Party should not be in favor of a platform that includes sedition:

“… Republicans are the party that ended slavery and [the] first Republican president, Abraham Lincoln, thwarted the south’s attempt to secede.”

Sorry, modern Republican Party, you cannot call yourselves the Party of Lincoln. That party died in 1980 when the GOP convention nominated Ronald Reagan, a man who ran as the states rights candidate. The Ronald Reagan who spoke these words in Philadelphia Mississippi:

I believe in states’ rights and I believe in people doing as much as they can for themselves at the community level and at the private level. I believe we have distorted the balance of our government today by giving powers that were never intended to be given in the Constitution to that federal establishment.

He spoke specifically to those who left the Democratic Party after the Civil Rights Act was passed. These were people who Reagan called “Reagan Democrats”; quite a few of them had not finished fighting the Civil War and when they heard the dog whistle, they were ready to “convert”.

The Party of Reagan was born that day and it was built over the next 30+ years by tapping into the rich vein of racial animus and into the unresolved anger over a war lost a hundred years earlier. This fact was not missed by those who watched what later unfolded. William Raspberry writing in the Washington Post:

It was bitter symbolism for black Americans (though surely not just for black Americans). Countless observers have noted that Reagan took the Republican Party from virtual irrelevance to the ascendancy it now enjoys. The essence of that transformation, we shouldn’t forget, is the party’s successful wooing of the race-exploiting Southern Democrats formerly known as Dixiecrats. And Reagan’s Philadelphia appearance was an important bouquet in that courtship.

No, Republican Party, you are not the Party of Lincoln. Abraham Lincoln would renounce you, denounce your racist pandering, and reject your refusal to accept that we are a nation of laws.

This Abraham Lincoln.

See where it says “HE SAVED THE UNION”? That is actually a Big Huge Deal. The anger of the Dixiecrats at the Democratic Party for embracing the Civil Rights movement led to them hating Democrats more than they hated Lincoln.

Your party is the Party of Reagan. And your party did not end slavery … your party did not want to preserve the union … your party does not even believe in the Constitution of the United States.

Yes, later in the day the delegates at the Wisconsin GOP convention (after first removing the secession language while keeping the states rights portion to try to make it more palatable) voted down the platform amendment. But you are left with the thing created by Reagan and nurtured by the extremists you have embraced. Like this guy:

Don Hilbig, a delegate from Rock County, spoke in support of the measure. “There is no more burning question than our sovereign rights as a state,” he said. “Secession is a critical part of that.”

Try getting that off your shoe.


Motley Monday Check in and Mooselaneous Musings

 photo Monday2_zps83ab71bd.jpg

  Good morning Motley Meese! Hope your weekend was lovely.


  PLEASE Don’t Recommend the check-in diary!
 

        Fierces on the weather jar comment are still welcome.

The check-in is an open thread and general social hour.

It’s traditional but not obligatory to give us a weather check where you are and let us know what’s new, interesting, challenging or even routine in your life lately. Nothing is particularly obligatory here except:

Always remember the Moose Golden (Purple?) Rule:

Be kind to each other… or else.

What could be simpler than that, right?

 photo aabarack_zps3f1ea948.jpg


Sunday All Day Check-in for the Herd

  Make sure you let your peeps

  know where to find you!  


    PLEASE Do Not Recommend the check-in diary!
   

        Fierces on the Weather Critter Comment are obligatory welcome.

The morning check-in is an open thread posted to give you a place to visit with the meeses. Feel free to chat about your weather, share a bit of your life, grump (if you must), rave (if you can). The diarist du jour sometimes posts and runs, other times sticks around for a bit, often returns throughout the day and always cares that meeses are happy … or at least contented.

On weekends (and holidays), you may find the check-in thread earlier or later than normal because … it is the weekend! Moosies need their beauty rest:

For those new to the Moose, Kysen left a Moose Welcome Mat (Part Deux) so, please, wipe your feet before you walk in the front door start posting.

The important stuff to get you started:

– Comments do not Auto-refresh. Click the refresh/reload on your tab to see new ones. Only click Post once for comments. When a diary’s comment threads grow, the page takes longer to refresh and the comment may not display right away.

– To check for replies to your comments, click the “My Comments” link in the right-hand column (or go to “My Moose”). Comments will be listed and a link to Recent Replies will be shown. (Note: Tending comments builds community)

– Ratings: Fierce means Thumbs Up, Fail means Thumbs Down, Meh means one of three things: I am unFailing you but I can’t Fierce you, I am unFiercing after a mistaken Fierce … or Meh. Just Meh. (p.s. Ratings don’t bestow mojo, online behaviour does).

– The Recommended list has a prominent place on the Front Page because it reflects the interests of the Moose. When people drive-by, we want them to see what we are talking about: news, politics, science, history, personal stories, culture. The list is based on number of recs and days on the list. Per Kysen: “The best way to control Rec List content is to ONLY rec diaries you WANT to see ON the list.

– Finally, the posting rules for a new diary: “Be excellent to each other… or else

(Some other commenting/posting/tending notes for newbies can be found in this past check-in and, of course, consult Meese Mehta for all your questions on meesely decorum.)

You can follow the daily moosetrails here: Motley Moose Recent Comments.

~

So … what’s going on in your neck of Moosesylvania??



~


What is Succeeding Together?

Crossposted from From Her Silence.

 photo SucceedingTogether5_zps7306f4ed.jpg

There is a community-based movement taking place in Democratic Republic of the Congo, supported by a program called Succeeding Together. It is structured to help women help each other by providing education, training, and leadership skills for creating businesses, assisting with family health, and economic development. Now that the graduates are enjoying success, they need a little of your help to spread the word about their work. They want to tell the people of Congo about the positive changes they’ve made in their lives and communities — and want everyone in Congo to know that they can do it too.

Lasting, positive change in Congo has to come from the people of Congo. And it will.

Please help spread the word via social media, your friends, and your family.

KuangSi2Succeeding Together is a program that helps women improve their lives by learning leadership skills and then paying it forward. It is run by an organization called HOLD-DRC. HOLD is an acronym for Humanitarian Organization for Lasting Development, and was incorporated as a non-profit inside Democratic Republic of the Congo in April 2012. Succeeding Together is focused on helping single mothers — teenage, unwed, abandoned — build a better life for themselves and their communities.

Mothers of children born outside of marriage are often left to the periphery of society. Traditionally, they can hold no position of real respect, and often live with their children in abject poverty with no hope for a better life. There isn’t even a common word for “unwed mother” in the DRC — the term means “girl mother” at best, and it demonstrates that these women are not held in any esteem.

HOLD thinks these women have tremendous value. In fact, they have so much value that they can change the face of Congo.

When a woman enters Succeeding Together, she joins a human development club of about ten other women who are living in her neighborhood. They support each other and share circular credit to help start and grow their businesses. Together, they become leaders in their community.

They complete a comprehensive training program that includes:

KuangSi2

  • Earning an associate’s degree in tailoring, cosmetology, or culinary arts.

  • Training in how to run a business.

  • Leadership skills, with focus on governance and peer education in human rights and basic health. This includes malaria prevention, HIV prevention, planned approaches to reproduction, and how to avoid and care for common illnesses such as respiratory infections.

  • Training in early childhood development. HOLD-DRC also runs a daycare for mothers who are studying in their programs. Day care centers are mostly unknown in the DRC.

  • Peer support and opportunities to exercise leadership.

  • Peer support in growing their businesses and establishing a credit history.

KuangSi2Most of the people in the DRC who want to start a small business don’t have access to microcredit. That involves a bank, and they mostly haven’t been in a position to attract one. To that end, HOLD has initiated a rotating credit program. The graduates of Succeeding Together can have access to a small pot of money which they share with a small group of other graduates in their neighborhood. If a group of five women shared a pot of $100, three women might borrow $20 each to grow their businesses and pay back the pot plus interest in six months. Then another woman has a turn to pay it forward. This keeps their businesses growing, and they establish a business ownership and credit history — which is what a bank or credit institution wants to see before extending microcredit.

These women are sharing what they learned with other women, and together they are making quite an impact. Their lives are changed, their communities are stronger, and they are building a better future for Congo.

They want to tell others how. They want to grow their movement across the country.

There isn’t a lot of communication in the DRC aside from national radio, so they need help to spread the word about how this program can help women help each other. Cell phone technology is growing by leaps and bounds, though, and internet access is becoming more common. These technologies are leading the way, so they have a new way to tell Congo about Succeeding Together:

They want to make their music video viral.

Maisha Soul, and Innoss’B are A-list Congolese pop musicians who offered their time, studio, and talents to make and distribute a music video with Succeeding Together graduates to spread a message of hope and change. This was shot in Goma, at HOLD-DRC, where their programs are held. The women are Succeeding Together are singing in their own words:

1st Verse:

My dream was to have a better life

Everywhere I went, I couldn’t make it happen

Now, today I saw the way

Who knew! that by my own strength I can do it

Oh oh oh I saw the way!

Stand up never give up — it’s never too late!


Let’s hold hands and succeed/overcome together.

2nd Verse:

Yesterday I had problems

Here in the village I was laughed at

My whole family threw me/kicked me out ah ah!

My hunger/desire for life was exhausted

But today I saw light I learned work/handicrafts

I have faith now that I will overcome

Oh oh i have faith now that I will . . . succeed

Oh oh I have faith now that we will . . . . succeed

3rd Verse:

My name is [redacted by rb137].

I dream of being a counselor for construction, for unity.

I would never dream of being a counselor of division, of hatred or of tribalism . . . .

4th Verse:

My dream is to contribute to the development of my country.

My dream is to take care of myself my whole life long.

Oh me, as I am a woman, I must be a complement, not a burden

Refrain:

Stand up never give up — it’s never too late!

Tushikane mkono Tushinde pamoja! (We will hold hands and succeed together!)

And if you want to help these women share their movement, please spread the word — and the video. The more legs it grows the more it will accomplish!

If you want to donate to this program, you can do so at ACT for Congo’s nascent website.